<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
    <responseDate>2026-05-15T17:03:19.968Z</responseDate>
    <request verb="GetRecord" identifier="ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai:2:10918" metadataPrefix="dim">http://ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai</request>
    <GetRecord>
        <record>
            <header>
                <identifier>ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai:2:10918</identifier>
                <datestamp>2025-01-09T11:05:49Z</datestamp>
                <setSpec>2</setSpec>
            </header>
            <metadata>
                <dim:dim>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en">Conceptual framework of coaches’ decision-making in conventional sports</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2025</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai/record/2/10918</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1498186/full</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="id:50643" confidence="-1">E. Kolar</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="id:50644" confidence="-1">R. Biloslavo</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="id:50645" confidence="-1">R. Pišot</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="etfid:776" confidence="-1">S. Veličković</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="id:50647" confidence="-1">M. Tušek</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract">Introduction: A coach’s managerial and pedagogical tasks in the sports training
process constitute the substantive core of their work, while decision-making
serves as the fundamental method underpinning these tasks. Some decisions
made by coaches result from deliberate, analytical thinking, which involves
extensive information gathering, analysis, and discussion. Others, however, are
made quickly and spontaneously, triggered by unforeseen situations during
training or competition that demand immediate action. Consequently, the
purpose of this study is to develop a conceptual framework for understanding
coaches’ decision-making behavior in conventional sports. This framework aims
to establish appropriate relationships between the various decisions coaches
make during the training process and theoretical concepts related to decisionmaking,
both in general and within the coaching context.
Methods: To design the research, we used the methodology of a conceptual
paper and a “model paper” approach, which seeks to build a theoretical
framework that predicts relationships between distinct research concepts and
scientific disciplines, aiming to integrate them into a cohesive model of coaches’
decision-making behavior.
Results: The proposed conceptual framework encompasses a comprehensive
range of situations that may arise during the sports training process and potential
ways to address them. This framework identifies different types of decisions
and characteristics associated with coaches’ decision-making behavior. It
incorporates various sport-specific and general theories of decision-making
and cognitive functioning to offer a deeper understanding of how coaches
process and execute decisions in diverse contexts.
Discussion: The developed conceptual framework outlines three primary types
of decisions—strategic, tactical, and operational—each playing a distinct role
in the broader sports training process. These decisions are based on different
cognitive processes, which manifest in varied decision-making behaviors and
are reinforced by specific leadership styles. The practical value of this framework
lies in its potential application for selecting appropriate experts to address the
diverse decision-making scenarios encountered in sports training. This ensures
the alignment of decision-making styles with the requirements of specific
training situations, thereby enhancing the effectiveness and outcomes of the
coaching process.</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type">article</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="doi">doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1498186</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="citation" qualifier="volume">15</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="citation" qualifier="spage">15</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="citation" qualifier="epage">15</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="issn">1664-1078</dim:field>
                    <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="source">Frontiers in Psychology</dim:field>
                </dim:dim>
            </metadata>
        </record>
    </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>
