2026-05-09T11:14:39.377Z http://ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai

ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai:1:10329 2025-01-27T16:56:43Z 1

23 rd International Congress of Byzantine Studies, 2016 http://ezaposleni.singidunum.ac.rs/rest/sciNaucniRezultati/oai/record/1/10329 https://www.academia.edu/27868222/Proceedings_23rd_International_Congress_of_Byzantine_Studies_Belgrade_22_27_August_2016_ed_S_Marjanovi%C4%87_Du%C5%A1ani%C4%87 J. Pavlović Byzantine texts within the VIII-century textual tradition, addressing their origins, interdependence, and transmission. A critical question is whether Adversus Constantinum derives directly from Νουθεσία or stands as an independent source, as well as the implications of uniting these texts under a single textual stemma, which could risk diminishing their distinct traditions. Analysis of manuscript evidence, including Parisinus graecus 1115 and Codex Vaticanus graecus 1652, reveals continuity in Adversus Constantinum and suggests that both texts share elements with Oriental sources, indicative of complex textual borrowing across regions and centuries. conferenceObject 875 876 Dating Νουθεσία γέροντος and Boris Melioranskij Theory Revalidation,